Contact us Heritage collections Image license terms
HOME ACL ACD C&A INF CCD Mainframes Super-computers Graphics Networking Bryant Archive Data Literature
Further reading □ Overview89INFO289INFO389INFO489INFO589INFO689INFO789INFO889INFO989INFO1089INFO13
CISD Archives Contact us Heritage archives Image license terms

Search

   
CCDPaul Bryant's ArchiveEARN information
CCDPaul Bryant's ArchiveEARN information
ACL ACD C&A INF CCD CISD Archives
Further reading

Overview89INFO289INFO389INFO489INFO589INFO689INFO789INFO889INFO989INFO1089INFO13

Status report on actions From Montpellier meeting 5 Sep

References :

-1- Minutes of the 1st meeting - Montpellier, September 5
-2- First status report dated 20 September.
-3- Minutes of the 2nd meeting - Montpellier, December 6

The above documents are appended.

Actions and recommendations :

-1- CNUSC will send an organisation chart to be included in the final
    report.
-2- CNUSC will define an emergency procedure available from any node
    24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
-3- CNUSC will define a new procedure for sending messages to LINKFAIL.
-4- Eric Thomas will change the 'REPLY' option of LINKFAIL to
    'REPLY to SENDER'.
-5- CNUSC and CUNY will co-ordinate their technique to restart the line.
    The objective is to have less than 5% downtime (monthly average).
    If a regular restart is chosen, it should be 5 minutes or less.
-6- It is recommended to CNUSC to investigate the possibility to have
    a dedicated computer as EARN international node.
-7- CNUSC is requested to produce statistics on lines down time
    (including CPU down time).
-8- CNUSC is asked to look at the possibility to have trained operators
    24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
-9- CNUSC and CERN are requested to investigate the problem of idle line
    even when queues are not empty and to propose a solution.
-10- It is recommended to CERN to use RSCS V2 to communicate on lines
     with RSCS V2 at the other end.
-11- CNUSC is requested to suppress the priority ageing on files queued
     on international lines, and, more generally, to implement all EARN
     directives.

Status :

-1- Done. See previous minutes/status report.
-2- Done. See previous minutes/status report.
-3- Done since January 15, 1989.
-4- Done. See previous minutes/status report.
-5- Done. See previous minutes/status report.
    Notes: A) CNUSC restarts the line every 3 minutes and CUNY every
    -----     5 minutes.
 
           B) Due to satellite problems, the line between FRMOP22 and
              CUNYVM is down at least once every day (but not for a
              long time).
-6- No immediate action. See first status report. Checkpoint next April.
-7- LMON, the Eric Thomas's procedure cannot easily be adapted to JES2.
    Other ways (such as NETMASTER) are investigated, No implementation
    date available now. Checkpoint next April.
-8- Not possible. See first status report for more details.
-9- The problem disappeared with the use of the 64 Kb/s line since
    February 2nd.
-10- Done. See previous minutes/status report.
-11- Done. See previous minutes/status report, and report on
           implementation of directives/recommendations.

Minutes of meeting held in CNUSC Montpellier on Monday 5 September 1988

Participants: J.L. Ambrosino       CNUSC - Montpellier
              Michel Auffret       CNUSC - Montpellier
              Alain Auroux         EARN  - Paris
              Jose Maria Blasco    GMD   - Bonn
              Jean-Loic Delhaye    CNUSC - Montpellier
              Olivier Martin       CERN  - Geneve
              Eric Thomas          CERN  - Geneve

Reasons for the meeting.

As Montpellier is the most important EARN international node, with nearly 50% of the international lines, including both 64 Kb/s lines, the availability of this node should be very high, particularly on the most heavily used lines (to USA, CERN and Germany).

In the past few months, there have been complaints on the availability of this node, and more precisely on the availability of the lines to CUNY and to CERN.

Objectives of the meeting.

The objective of this meeting was to review the validity of these complaints, the actions already taken by Montpellier, and to recommend further actions if needed.

Detailed points.

-1- Difficulty to contact people in Montpellier having technical
    networking responsibilities on EARN.
 
    J.M. Blasco distributed an organization chart of GMD Bonn showing
    the responsibilities of various people involved in EARN.
 
  ACTION:
 
    J.L. Delhaye will provide the same information for Montpellier.
 
-2- When a problem in Montpellier is detected from another node, it is
    difficult to get an answer/explanation from Montpellier when
    Dominique Dumas is absent (week-end, night...).
 
  ACTION:
 
    Montpellier will define an emergency procedure available from any
    node 24 h/day. This procedure will not be through telephone, as many
    people have difficulty to access foreign telephone numbers.
 
-3- Messages posted on LINKFAIL by Montpellier are not explanatory enough
    and are sent using a standard form.
 
  ACTION:
 
    Montpellier will define a new procedure for sending messages to
    LINKFAIL:
    - Reasons for failures will be explained
    - Messages will be signed, and it will be possible to reply to
      the sender (for example to ask for additional information).
    - Scheduled downtime (maintenance) will be announced only once.
    - Link down will not be reported if shorter than one hour
    - Unscheduled link down will be explained afterwards if longer than
      one hour (at least on the major links, and during prime shift).
 
  ACTION:
 
    Eric Thomas will change the 'REPLY' option of LINKFAIL to
    'REPLY to SENDER'.
 
-4- On the line MOP-CUNY, the technique used at both ends of the line
    to restart it is different (MOP restarts every 10 minutes, and
    CUNY when a cut down is detected). This leads to an unacceptable
    down time.
 
  ACTION:
 
    CNUSC and CUNY will coordinate their technique to restart the line.
    The objective is to have less than 5% downtime (monthly average).
    If a regular restart is chosen, it should be 5 minutes or less.
 
-5- The line MOP-CERN was not reliable enough during the past months.
    A new communication controller is installed at CERN since 17/8.
    No specific action is needed.
 
-6- Based on other international nodes experience, a small, dedicated
    computer is generally more reliable than a big, general purpose,
    computer. As FRMOP22 is the EARN international node with the greater
    traffic and the greater number of lines, it would be better to
    have all EARN international lines in Montpellier on a small,
    dedicated computer.
 
  RECOMMENDATION
 
    It is recommended to CNUSC to investigate the possibility to have
    a dedicated computer as EARN international node.
 
  ACTION
 
    CNUSC is requested to produce statistics on lines down time
    (including CPU down time).
 
-7- FRMOP22 operators are present only from 6:00 to 20:00 (week days)
    and 6:00 to 13:00 (Saturday). No operator on Sunday.
 
  ACTION
 
    CNUSC is asked to look at the possibility to have trained operators
    24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
 
-8- It is a protocol problem on the CNUSC-CERN line: it happens that,
    after a line failure and a restart from CERN, JES fails in attempting
    to re-establish the connection. This means that, although the line
    is up, it is in wait state at both ends, and no files are sent, even
    when the queues are not empty. Automatic procedures to restart
    the line are useless, it is then needed for operators at both ends
    to speak to each other.
    If this happens when it is no operator at CNUSC, the line stays down
    until the next day (or next Monday if during week-end).
 
  ACTION:
 
    - See point 7 above
    - CNUSC and CERN are requested to investigate this problem, and
      to find a solution.
    - It is recommended to CERN to use RSCS V2 to communicate on lines
      with RSCS V2 at the other end.
 
-9- CNUSC uses a priority aging on files queued on the EARN lines: this
    may cause a huge file to be sent before smaller ones. This
    is in conflict with the EARN directive number 1, adopted by the
    BoD in April 1988.
 
  ACTION:
 
    CNUSC is requested to suppress the priority aging on files queued
    on international lines, and, more generally, to implement all EARN
    directives.

Summary of actions and recommendations:

-1- CNUSC will send an organization chart to be included in the final
    report. Due date: 12 Sep.
 
-2- CNUSC will define an emergency procedure available from any node
    24 hours/day, 7 days/week. Due date for procedure definition:
    12 Sept.
 
-3- CNUSC will define a new procedure for sending messages to LINKFAIL.
    Due date for procedure definition: 12 Sept.
 
-4- Eric Thomas will change the 'REPLY' option of LINKFAIL to
    'REPLY to SENDER'.
 
-5- CNUSC and CUNY will coordinate their technique to restart the line.
    The objective is to have less than 5% downtime (monthly average).
    If a regular restart is chosen, it should be 5 minutes or less.
 
-6- It is recommended to CNUSC to investigate the possibility to have
    a dedicated computer as EARN international node.
 
-7- CNUSC is requested to produce statistics on lines down time
    (including CPU down time).
 
-8- CNUSC is asked to look at the possibility to have trained operators
    24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
 
-9- CNUSC and CERN are requested to investigate the problem of idle line
    even when queues are not empty and to propose a solution.
 
-10- It is recommended to CERN to use RSCS V2 to communicate on lines
     with RSCS V2 at the other end.
 
-11- CNUSC is requested to suppress the priority aging on files queued
     on international lines, and, more generally, to implement all EARN
     directives.

Status report on actions and recommendations from the Montpellier meeting held on 5 September.

-1- CNUSC will send an organization chart to be included in the final
    report. Due date: 12 Sep.
Done. Enclosed are the organisation charts from GMD - Bonn, Montpellier
      and CERN

Whom to contact at GMD-Bonn

Name                 Function            EARN                   Phone
Jose Maria Blasco    All DEARN          JMBLASCO@DEARN     +49 228/81996-51
Manfred Bogen        Concerns,          MABOGEN@DEARN      +49 228/81996-50
                     VM, RSCS,
                     LISTSERV,
                     EARNCC.
Jochen Hirsch        Lines,NCP-         GRZ028@DBNGMD21   +49 228/81996-44
                     System-Generation
Peter Sylvester      EARNunder          GRZ027@DBNGMD21   +49 228/81996-45
                     MVS, NJE, JES2
Peter Wunderling     SNI, SNA, XI,      GRZ017@DBNGMD21   +49 228/81996-46
                     X.25,AGFNet.
Klaus Birkenbihl     Director of        GRZ003@DBNGMD21   +49 228/81996-41
                     Computing Center

Whom to contact at CNUSC-Montpellier

Name                 Function            EARN                   Phone
Dominique Dumas      EARN Country        BRUCH@FRMOP11    +33 67 14 14 14
                     Coordinator (NCC)
Jean-Paul Sauter     Telecom. lines      SAUTER@FRMOP11   +33 67 14 14 14
     and             NCP, SNA, XI
Jean Oudeville       etc...              JEAN@FRMOP11     +33 67 14 14 14
Jean-Louis Ambrosino Operations manager  AMBROSI@FRMOP11  +33 76 14 14 14
Jean-Loic Delhaye    Technical director  DELHAYE@FRMOP11  +33 76 14 14 14
Jean-Claude Ippolito Director of CNUSC   IPPOLIJ@FRMOP11  +33 67 14 14 14

Whom to contact at CERN

Olivier Martin   All CEARN and CERN     MARTIN@CEARN      +41 22 83-4894
                 with respect to the
                 EARN service at Cern,
                 in general.
Central Cern Operations  Everything     CONSOLE@CERNVM    +41 22 83-5011
                 (e.g. line problems)
                 should normally go
                 through them.
Eric Thomas      On a voluntary         ERIC@LEPICS       +41 22 83-4992
                 basis, only!           ERIC@CEARN
                 (LISTSERV, etc).
Dave Underhill   Cern Operations (IBM)  DJUCT@CERNVM      +41 22 83-4920
Mick Draper      Network Operations     MICK@CERNVM       +41 22 83-3348
-2- CNUSC will define an emergency procedure available from any node
    24 hours/day, 7 days/week. Due date for procedure definition:
    12 Sept.
PUPITRE@FRMOP11 will be the emergency contact, starting 1st of October.
The owner of this network address will be responsible for any further
action needed.
-3- CNUSC will define a new procedure for sending messages to LINKFAIL.
    Due date for procedure definition: 12 Sept.
Starting 1st of November, the above mentioned network address
(PUPITRE@FRMOP11) will be the LINKFAIL interface. Operators are
presently being trained to efficiently send messages to and use
information from LINKFAIL.
-4- Eric Thomas will change the 'REPLY' option of LINKFAIL to
    'REPLY to SENDER'.
Done. Today all LINKFAIL peers are Reply-To=Sender.
-5- CNUSC and CUNY will coordinate their technique to restart the line.
    The objective is to have less than 5% downtime (monthly average).
    If a regular restart is chosen, it should be 5 minutes or less.
Starting 1st of October, Montpellier will restart all EARN international
lines every 5 minutes. CUNY has been requested by Montpellier to react
to line failure as quickly as possible.
-6- It is recommended to CNUSC to investigate the possibility to have
    a dedicated computer as EARN international node.
After a 6 month period, Montpellier will review the results of the
actions taken which should improve the availability of the Montpellier
international lines. If the improvement is not good enough (down time
higher than 5% on major lines) Montpellier will study the possibility
to have a dedicated computer as EARN international node.
It should be noted that the implementation of the OSI migration plan
will have an impact on the infrastructure.
-7- CNUSC is requested to produce statistics on lines down time
    (including CPU down time).
This will be done starting 1st of October.
-8- CNUSC is asked to look at the possibility to have trained operators
    24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
For budget reasons, this is not possible. However, night operators will
be trained to take simple actions, and to call at any time the trained
operator on duty if his presence is needed.
-9- CNUSC and CERN are requested to investigate the problem of idle line
    even when queues are not empty and to propose a solution.
Since the meeting, the cause of the problem seems to have been
identified (monitoring of NACK) and remedies will be taken before the
the 1st of October.
-10- It is recommended to CERN to use RSCS V2 to communicate on lines
     with RSCS V2 at the other end.
RSCS V2 already installed at CEARN, and will be operational soon.
-11- CNUSC is requested to suppress the priority aging on files queued
     on international lines, and, more generally, to implement all EARN
     directives.
Will be done no later than 1st of October.

Minutes of meeting held at CNUSC (Montpellier) - 6 December 1988

 Participants : J.L. Ambrosino
                M. Auffret
                A. Auroux
                D. Dumas
                J. Oudeville
                J.P. Sauter
 

Reasons for the meeting : Status report on actions and recommendations from the Montpellier meeting held at CNUSC on 5th September 1988

References : Minutes of the meeting and first status report dated 20 September.

Actions and recommendations :

 
-1- CNUSC will send an organization chart to be included in the final
    report.
 
-2- CNUSC will define an emergency procedure available from any node
    24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
 
-3- CNUSC will define a new procedure for sending messages to LINKFAIL.
 
-4- Eric Thomas will change the 'REPLY' option of LINKFAIL to
    'REPLY to SENDER'.
 
-5- CNUSC and CUNY will coordinate their technique to restart the line.
    The objective is to have less than 5% downtime (monthly average).
    If a regular restart is chosen, it should be 5 minutes or less.
 
-6- It is recommended to CNUSC to investigate the possibility to have
    a dedicated computer as EARN international node.
 
-7- CNUSC is requested to produce statistics on lines down time
    (including CPU down time).
 
-8- CNUSC is asked to look at the possibility to have trained operators
    24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
 
-9- CNUSC and CERN are requested to investigate the problem of idle line
    even when queues are not empty and to propose a solution.
 
-10- It is recommended to CERN to use RSCS V2 to communicate on lines
     with RSCS V2 at the other end.
 
-11- CNUSC is requested to suppress the priority aging on files queued
     on international lines, and, more generally, to implement all EARN
     directives.

Status :

The resources needed to implement some of the recommended actions were initially underestimated, and corresponding implementation dates shifted.

CNUSC is now committing to meet the new dates below.

-1- Done. The chart was included in the first status report. (20 September)
 
-2- Done. PUPITRE@FRMOP11 is the emergency contact since November 1st.
    However, it is not used very much. A mail is sent on December 15.
    to LINKFAIL to inform every body.
 
-3- For the moment the messages to LINKFAIL are sent from NETOPER
    at FRMOP11, through an automatic procedure initiated by the
    operator. No mail should be sent to this ID.
    A new procedure will be define and operational on January 1st,
    1989 to send messages from PUPITRE at FRMOP11 and operators
    will be trained to use it.
 
-4- Done. See the 1st status report.
 
-5- Done. Since the 1st of  November, CNUSC restarts the line with
    CUNY every 3 minutes. Since the 1st of December, CUNY restarts
    the line every 5 minutes. This additional delay was due to the
    lack of answer from CUNY to the initial requests from CNUSC.
 
    Note : Due to satellite problems, the line between FRMOP22 and
    ----   CUNYVM is down at least once every day (but not for a
           long time).
 
-6- No immediate action. See first status report. Checkpoint next April.
 
-7- LMON, the Eric Thomas's procedure will be installed on FRMOP11 next
    January, tested in February and the results published every month
    starting in March.
 
-8- Not possible. See first status report for more details.
 
-9- The problem of the 9600 Kb line between CEARN and FRMOP22
    is not identify, neither by CEARN nor by CNUSC but the
    problem should be solved with the SNI 64Kb line.
 
-10- Done. See the 1st status report.
 
-11- The CNUSC suppressed the priority aging on October 1st.
     The directive number 3 cannot be applied by JES2 sites:
     JES2 is capable of multi-streaming but it is impossible
     to dedicate a stream to large files.
     Holding large files during the day is not today technically
     possible.
     
⇑ Top of page
© Chilton Computing and UKRI Science and Technology Facilities Council webmaster@chilton-computing.org.uk
Our thanks to UKRI Science and Technology Facilities Council for hosting this site