Prof. HARTREE gave a summary of checking facilities provided by American designers, saying that:
Prof. HARTREE also said that Prof. AIKEN was fond of pointing out that unless the reliability of a machine was very high its overall speed depended primarily on the frequency of faults and the ease and speed with which they could be diagnosed and detected, rather than on the speed of arithmetical operations. Reliability, therefore, was the most important thing to aim at.
Dr. UTTLEY mentioned that the Bell Telephone Laboratories machine had a lot of built in checking equipment.
Prof. WILLIAMS said that at Manchester they had tried to avoid the incorporation of any non-essential components of their machine. They felt that the less apparatus there was, the less there was to go wrong and the sooner they would have a machine. He thought faults were usually reasonably obvious without red lamps and he would always back the man who had lived with the machine against other systems of fault finding. Dr. KILBURN referred to the use of test programmes for localizing faults. Experience was that once a fault had been traced to an 8-valve chassis it could be located in a few minutes.
Prof. HARTREE suggested that if Mr. NOBLE could make a circuit with 10 stable states it might sound the death knell of the binary system. Dr. UTTLEY said that so far they had only obtained 5 stable states. In reply to Dr. KOSTEN he said that at present their storage system had only 2 stable states. In his view a 50% increase in complication would be well worth while if an indication of where things were going wrong could be obtained. At T.R.E. they were fortunate in having time available for investigation before they started to build their machine.
Dr. GOODWIN said that although compensating errors did not occur very often in computation they occurred occasionally. With a high-speed machine it might possibly be necessary to guard against their occurrence.