Contact us Heritage collections Image license terms
HOME ACL Associates Technology Literature Applications Society Software revisited
Further reading □ OverviewAbout FerrantiBrochure □ Architecture □ Architecture1-Level StorageWordsInstructionsOrder CodeAnimated □ Hardware □ Fixed StoreSupervisorOverviewSchedulerCore MemoryAtlas CardAtlas ConsoleConsole Details □ Chilton □ Chilton AtlasDownstairs □ Manchester □ Manchester Atlas □ London □ London AtlasLondon Software □ Atlas II □ Atlas 2 BrochureTitan AutocodeCambridge Atlas □ Closure □ Atlas Closure
ACD C&A INF CCD CISD Archives Contact us Heritage archives Image license terms

Search

   
ACLTechnologyATLAS
ACLTechnologyATLAS
ACL ACD C&A INF CCD CISD Archives
Further reading

OverviewAbout FerrantiBrochure
Architecture
Architecture1-Level StorageWordsInstructionsOrder CodeAnimated
Hardware
Fixed StoreSupervisorOverviewSchedulerCore MemoryAtlas CardAtlas ConsoleConsole Details
Chilton
Chilton AtlasDownstairs
Manchester
Manchester Atlas
London
London AtlasLondon Software
Atlas II
Atlas 2 BrochureTitan AutocodeCambridge Atlas
Closure
Atlas Closure

Cambridge Atlas

Construction of the Cambridge Atlas 2 Peripheral and Tape Co-ordinators

Construction of the Cambridge Atlas 2 Peripheral and Tape Co-ordinators
Full image ⇗
© UKRI Science and Technology Facilities Council

Only three Atlas 1 computers were built. The Atlas 2 system was a joint development between Ferranti and Cambridge. The aim was to produce a more modest but largely compatible computer. Even so the commercial price was still well over £1M. Three Atlas 2 Machines were made. The first machine installed was the Cambridge Titan. The other two machines were installed at the Department of Industry's CAD Centre in Cambridge and Aldermaston. Cambridge used the CAD Centre Atlas while Titan was being moved to a new building in 1969.

The main differences were the lack of virtual memory and the associated drum store, the removal of the fixed store, and a different magnetic tape control system. Cambridge designed a new operating system. The machine was called Titan and it ran the Titan Supervisor.

The other difference between the two machines was in the memory. Atlas 2 used slower core store. The cycle time on the Atlas 1 was 2µsecs compared with 2.5µsecs for the Atlas 2. Whereas the first Atlas 1 began operating in December 1962, the first Atlas 2 did not work until September 1963. One advantage of the Atlas 2 was more core store. The minimal configuration was 64K words and it could be increased to 128K words. This compares with the 48K words of the Chilton Atlas 1.

⇑ Top of page
© Chilton Computing and UKRI Science and Technology Facilities Council webmaster@chilton-computing.org.uk
Our thanks to UKRI Science and Technology Facilities Council for hosting this site